
“Late Innings”

Semi-random musings, poems, and visual images from the journey


As you can see, I’m a massive fan of Moleskine notebooks and have used them over the years for various purposes like journaling, poetry, capturing random ideas, sketching, etc. Their first page has a space to record your name and offer a reward in case of loss. I immediately saw this as an opportunity for an inside joke with myself; an opening salvo to set the tone that silly was, as ever, in season. Yet, looking back, I recognize that it took me a long time to harness my inner audience (I’m consciously avoiding the term critic as too formal and judgmental), those various selves who collectively decide the things deemed interesting and worthy of investigation. The jokes that I find funny. The art that moves something inside me. My favorite films. The music that is soundtrack of my life. And I like the idea that when amassed, this forms a unique fingerprint of my specific tastes (albeit at a given place and time). In my younger days, I was a bit of a people-pleaser and too often swayed by the opinion of others. I now see that it’s a major milestone when you grant yourself the power to be the final arbiter of your own tastes. I remember being in my 30’s and dating a woman who was self-confident and discerning and also fairly critical. Her opinions mattered more than they should have. Anyway, the song “My Love” by Paul McCartney came on and she quite dismissively expressed her disdain. But without even thinking about it, I responded, “Oh, I love this song!” And it was at that very moment that I realized I had turned an invisible corner. That I was at the helm and there was no looking back. But don’t be misled, this is a long toil in figuring out. But it’s the very opposite of drudgery that pays handsomely in dividends of joy. And it is one of the most worthy efforts we can make in revealing our true selves.

Yet it’s not as if the input of others doesn’t matter. It matters greatly, in fact, in the accumulation of one’s preferences. How could it not? The lion’s share of my curated aesthetic has been facilitated by other people. Family, friends, girlfriends, acquaintances, classmates, writers, musicians in interviews, etc. In many instances, they turn you on to the things that ultimately shape and define your personal style. Many recommendations, of course, are set aside, but it is this very churn that helps you solidify your trove of cultural influences and artifacts. Would I have discovered the Beatles even if my older sister hadn’t put me onto them when I was eight? Yes. But it matters to me that it came through her. She is forever ensconced in my Beatles experience, as an embossed salutation and signature. As for Kenny G, he’s more a running joke (the hair alone!) with an old friend, to whom I recently had the absolute joy of sending his memoir via Amazon. That’s the essence of it, really. Amuse yourself first and then, hopefully, others…

My humor, obviously enough, skews towards irony and irreverence. And I think that in discovering yourself, you don’t so much adopt the humor of others; instead you connect with the people who share your overall sense and sensibility (or maybe in my case, nonsense and insensibility). As a lapsed Catholic, there’s little I enjoy more than skewering the inane hypocrisy of that flailing patriarchy. And this forms a sort of litmus test for my “trust circle” — meaning the more ardent your beliefs, the further out your orbit. Not be design, per se. It just happens to work out that way. And so, in the end, the Jesuits did actually teach me something worthwhile.

What post in these trying times would be complete without some disparagement of the World’s Biggest Asshole?? What an utterly shameless dickhead. A black hole of malignant narcissism. A Möbius buzz-stripper. The gods must be fucking crazy…

One of my favorite George Carlin lines: “Home is where you keep your stuff while you’re out getting more stuff.”

Under the influence of “The Twilight Zone” (episode “To Serve Man”). As Bosse-de-Nage from Dr. Faustroll would say, and only say, “Ha-ha!”

Billy Idol performed one of the loudest concerts I ever attended. He had an album called Cyberpunk (1993) that, for the record, I did not purchase. But I did see an interview in which he was asked to define the term, and he rather awkwardly squirmed while drawing a complete blank. Ironically, we could all intuitively define it today as some form of internet hacker-troll, an electronic tag-artist, a virtual vigilante. “White Wedding” was also one of the best from the “Literal Music Videos” series, if you can find it. His real name, BTW, is William Michael Albert Broad.

I just finished the book “Remarkably Bright Creatures” that I found mostly unremarkable, light and cloying (but please form your own opinion!). My favorite line though was this insult: “Why are you dressed like an extra from Caddyshack?”

I think we’ll end it here.

Here’s another exclusive song release from Tommy Treacle, the journeyman folk singer whose tunes range widely in subject matter, including horror films, pirate sea shanties, jingles for maid services, murder ballads, sporting legends, volcanoes, soup, space lasers, polyester leisure wear, Bigfoot, continental drift, sharks, unicycles, Egyptian mummies, and more recently politics. In this song called “The Trump Hole,” he subtly hints at his leanings as regards the current administration. Please have a listen and see if you can spot his position.
























In a depressing week of market selloffs and ever-escalating malfeasance from Trump/Musk, Inc., there was one bright spot. Duke University’s men’s basketball team, loaded with the best college talent (and most annoyingly entitled student body and alums) that money can buy, lost to Houston in the NCAA tournament semi-finals. There is hope!
“A loss for Duke is a win for America.” — Harry S. Truman

I reckon now that I’ve been wrong
The White House is where Trump belongs
It’s obvious, his vast appeal
This master of the art of the deal


Whenever there is trouble brewing
He’ll save us all from rack and ruin
I care not if he quotes “Mein Kampf”
Providing he can drain the swamp!


And he can frequent prostitutes
Just not while sporting a fresh tan suit
But news of knocks on him are fake
In fact, Donnie never makes mistakes


For all mankind he bigly cares
With his deeds and in his prayers
Success right now has but begun
There’s much more winning to be won!

TRUMP/VANCE 2028!!

The folks at Hard Rock Cafe didn’t ask me, but here are my suggestions for naming their specialty cocktails in the Trump 2.0 era:
The Election Denier
The Insurrectionist
The Orange-faced, Poop-throwing Monkey
The Daily Dipshit
Covfefe Martini
The Feculent Philistine
The Unholy Smegroni
Gin and Clorox
Putin’s Lapdog
That Musk Rat
The Highball Hitler

You know what Andy Rooney would say? He’d say that Donald Trump is an irredeemable, lying-ass, corrupt, shit-for-brains jagoff who shouldn’t be within a thousand miles of the nuclear codes, that’s what. And you thought this was to be a nice little intermezzo from my running political diatribe. Fuck that!


Our laws cannot defend themselves. It takes people of sound reason and skill and passion (delivered dispassionately) and knowledge and courage. People who make forceful and logical arguments based upon facts and historical/legal precedent who will not bow to intimidation. Again, and again, and again until whatever febrile illness (in Trump’s case a fulminant coliform septicemia) that has overtaken our body politic has been broken. A blatant disregard for the laws and norms of our country simply cannot stand. Lawyers and judges have a sacred responsibility to uphold the Constitution, akin to medicine’s Hippocratic oath. So far, the response from our legal system have been tepid at best. Yes, several judges are holding the line in the face of death threats and the absurd talk of impeachment (I hasten to note that talk of SCOTUS “impeachment” and “recusals” from the Left related to the uncovering of blatant conflicts of interest, not simply their judicial opinions). But it is laughably illegal to bar members of certain firms from access to government buildings, for their lawful representation of clients, in an effort to extract concessions. This is Trump at his absolute worst: defiling the Constitution to serve his own narcissistic desire for revenge. It’s antithetical to democracy and is being abetted by a rogue GOP. And I sure hope that these assailed law firms are busy plotting a furious counter-offensive and not simply protecting their damn bonuses. Sometimes you have to step into the gutters and muddy your fancy white shoes. Wake the fuck up, motherfuckers!!
I’ve just finished the prologue to “The Great Dissenter,” a book by Peter Canellos about Supreme Court justice John Marshall Harlan. His lone dissenting opinions in several landmark cases at the end of the 19th century formed the basis of major civil rights reform decades later in the mid 20th. The majority opinion (8-1) in Civil Rights Cases of 1883 defanged the protections afforded by the 13th and 14th Constitutional Amendments enacted during the Reconstruction, returning jurisdiction for discriminatory acts back to the states where former Confederates and active Klan members presided. Harlan’s response underlined what he said had already been established by the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and in those amendments: “The supreme law of the land has decreed that no authority shall be exercised in this country on the basis of discrimination, in respect of civil rights, against freemen and citizens because of their race, color, or previous condition of servitude.” In a glorious irony, he penned his dissent with the very same inkstand that the ignominious Roger B. Taney had used for his now infamous (and, yes, dreadful) Dred Scott decision in 1857. Frederick Douglass called the 1883 decision “an act of surrender, almost akin to treachery.” He went on to say that Harlan’s dissent “should be scattered like leaves of autumn over the whole country.” He was right, of course, it would just take many decades for those leaves to take root in our nation’s recognized laws. And it was the great Thurgood Marshall who successfully argued for the plaintiffs before the Supreme Court in the 1954 case Brown v Board of Education, which finally overturned the precedent set in the 1896 case Plessy v. Ferguson (“separate but equal”). He is said to have waged his long campaign against racial injustice armed mainly with Harlan’s lone dissent in that case (a position Trump would have called a “loser”). The bottom line here is that against authoritarianism we do not acquiesce in advance and we doggedly defend essential institutions. With Trump and his storm troopers assaulting the free press, our universities, numerous government agencies, and much of the judicial system, we desperately need a few more heroes like John Marshall Harlan and Thurgood Marshall. The response to date from our big-shot law firms and marquee universities has been less than inspiring.